Remote | Clinical Research & Pharma Document Review Consultant — Up to $40/hour

24-Mag•New York, NY

6h•$30 - $40•Remote

About The Position

We are sharing a specialised part-time consulting opportunity for professionals experienced in pharmaceutical documentation, clinical trial materials, study protocol review, regulatory-style records, clinical research workflows, instruction-based task design, and structured evaluation. This role supports current and upcoming remote consulting opportunities focused on AI-assisted review of pharmaceutical and clinical research documents, forms, tables, study materials, and related visual content. Selected professionals will create complex evaluation tasks using clinical trial and pharma-related materials, define clear expected answers, and develop objective rubrics for assessing response accuracy, instruction alignment, and domain understanding.

Requirements

Professional experience in clinical research, pharmaceuticals, clinical trials, regulatory operations, medical writing, study coordination, pharmacovigilance, or related documentation work
Strong ability to interpret study protocols, trial forms, clinical research tables, eligibility criteria, safety documentation, and pharma-related records
Comfort working with precise instructions, objective criteria, and structured evaluation standards
Strong written communication skills with the ability to explain task expectations and review decisions clearly
High attention to detail when assessing accuracy, completeness, and instruction alignment
Ability to work independently in a remote, project-based environment
Consistency across repetitive, detail-oriented review and rubric-based evaluation tasks
Academic or professional background in pharmacy, clinical research, life sciences, biomedical sciences, nursing, medicine, public health, regulatory affairs, or a related field is highly relevant
Experience with clinical trial protocols, informed consent materials, case report forms, study schedules, regulatory-style documentation, safety records, or pharma documentation may be especially valuable
Training or professional experience involving clinical research operations, medical documentation review, trial coordination, regulatory review, data quality, or structured assessment is relevant
Advanced clinical research, pharmaceutical, regulatory, medical writing, or study operations experience may support project fit depending on scope

Nice To Haves

Experience creating assessment tasks, training materials, documentation standards, review guides, or structured evaluation rubrics
Familiarity with clinical trial phases, protocol design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, adverse event reporting, study visit schedules, or regulatory documentation
Experience reviewing protocols, case report forms, informed consent documents, tables, charts, safety narratives, or clinical research datasets
Comfort identifying ambiguity, missing information, unsupported assumptions, inconsistent study logic, or interpretation errors
Strong ability to design objective criteria for evaluating complex clinical research or pharmaceutical document reasoning tasks

Responsibilities

Create complex tasks based on clinical trial protocols, study forms, patient-facing materials, investigator documents, tables, charts, and pharma-related records
Define clear ground-truth answers, acceptable response criteria, and objective evaluation standards
Develop prompts that test study document interpretation, protocol reasoning, information extraction, data review, and careful instruction following
Ensure each task is clearly scoped, realistic, and suitable for structured review workflows
Evaluate AI-generated responses involving clinical research documents, pharmaceutical materials, study records, forms, tables, diagrams, and trial-related content
Assess whether responses correctly interpret study criteria, protocol details, timelines, dosage information, adverse event references, visit schedules, and document-specific instructions
Identify missing details, incorrect interpretations, unsupported assumptions, weak reasoning, or inconsistencies in the response
Review outputs against objective rubrics and project-specific quality standards
Develop clear rubrics that explain expected answers, grading criteria, and acceptable variations
Provide structured written feedback on task quality, response accuracy, and evaluation consistency
Apply detailed instructions carefully across pharmaceutical, clinical trial, and document-based review tasks
Participate in onboarding, calibration, or domain alignment activities when required