Remote | Attorney Legal Reasoning Review Consultant — $80–$150/hour

24-Mag•New York, NY

6h•Remote

About The Position

We are sharing a specialised part-time consulting opportunity for United States-based attorneys experienced in legal research, legal analysis, legal writing, primary authority review, multi-practice legal reasoning, advisory work, and structured legal content evaluation. This role supports current and upcoming remote consulting opportunities focused on AI-assisted legal reasoning evaluation, legal output review, primary authority verification, legal content refinement, and high-quality project execution. Selected professionals will evaluate legal reasoning across a range of practice areas, verify claims against relevant authority, identify issues in AI-generated legal content, and provide structured feedback based on detailed project criteria.

Requirements

3+ years of legal practice experience with client-facing, matter-facing, advisory, research, drafting, or analytical responsibilities
Active U.S. bar license in good standing
Strong ability to locate, evaluate, and cite primary legal authority
Excellent legal writing skills with the ability to explain complex issues in clear, plain language
Comfort researching outside a primary specialty when given structured review criteria
Strong attention to detail and ability to identify gaps in legal reasoning, authority, or factual assumptions
Professional judgment, discretion, and ability to work independently in a remote, asynchronous environment
JD from an ABA-accredited U.S. law school is required for attorney-level assignments
Active U.S. bar admission in good standing is required for attorney-level review work

Nice To Haves

Generalist or multi-practice exposure is especially relevant
Professional experience in litigation, transactional practice, regulatory work, corporate law, employment, commercial matters, real estate, intellectual property, privacy, compliance, financial services, healthcare, or other legal practice areas may support project fit
Experience involving legal research, legal memoranda, contract analysis, legal drafting, advisory work, or legal content review is highly relevant
Experience reviewing AI-generated legal content, legal research outputs, legal summaries, or legal drafting tools
Broad exposure across multiple practice areas or comfort handling unfamiliar legal issues through structured research
Experience with legal education, legal publishing, knowledge management, quality review, or attorney training
Strong ability to identify unsupported claims, misleading legal statements, missing caveats, or unclear jurisdictional assumptions
Familiarity with legal technology, legal operations, compliance workflows, or structured rubric-based evaluation
Ability to produce concise, well-reasoned written feedback under project guidelines

Responsibilities

Review and refine AI-generated legal outputs for accuracy, clarity, completeness, and usefulness
Evaluate legal reasoning across a range of practice areas and issue types
Identify unsupported conclusions, incomplete analysis, unclear explanations, or incorrect legal reasoning
Assess whether legal responses are written in clear, practical, and professionally appropriate language
Verify legal claims against primary authority, including statutes, regulations, cases, official guidance, and other authoritative legal sources
Identify whether cited authorities support the stated legal conclusions
Flag missing authority, weak support, outdated reasoning, or overbroad legal statements
Provide concise explanations connecting legal conclusions to relevant authority
Provide clear written feedback on legal analysis, reasoning quality, authority use, and drafting clarity
Apply consistent legal judgment across multiple review assignments and practice-area contexts
Follow detailed task instructions, evaluation rubrics, and project-specific quality standards accurately
Collaborate through structured remote workflows designed to assess and improve legal reasoning outputs