Staff Systems Engineer - Autonomy Behavior

GM•Sunnyvale, CA

About The Position

As a Staff Autonomy Behavior Systems Engineer, you will set the technical direction for how autonomous vehicle behavior is specified, evaluated, and supported by evidence. You will work across behavior, software, simulation, safety, legal, product, and operations to build a validation system that supports sound safety and launch decisions and can run continuously. You will bring deep experience evaluating autonomous vehicles in commercial fleets and understand the difference between a test that produces a result and a validation system people can trust. You will connect requirements, scene definitions, metrics, acceptance criteria, coverage, simulation validity, human references, and the decision process around the result.

Requirements

Master's degree in systems engineering, mechanical engineering, aerospace engineering, electrical engineering, computer science, robotics, or a related field.
8 or more years of professional experience in systems engineering, autonomous vehicles, robotics, vehicle development, simulation, or safety-critical validation.
A proven record of evaluating autonomous vehicles for a commercial fleet, launch, supervised release, or other high-consequence product decision.
Deep systems engineering fundamentals, including architecture and decomposition, use-case and scene modeling, requirements strategy, interface definition, verification and validation planning, and traceability.
Professional experience defining or leading simulation evaluation at scale, including the trade-offs between coverage, confidence, runtime, cost, and simulation validity.
Strong Python experience. You should be comfortable reading and writing production-quality analysis or validation software, reviewing designs and pull requests, and using code to test an engineering idea quickly.
Strong communication skills and the ability to create alignment among teams with different goals, terminology, and technical perspectives.
Demonstrated stakeholder management and technical leadership across organizational boundaries. You have led work through influence, not only through formal authority.
Evidence of setting direction beyond a single project, such as establishing a methodology, framework, lifecycle, platform, standard, or reusable validation process adopted by other engineers or teams.

Nice To Haves

Human benchmarking for behavior and safety evaluation, including attentive human benchmark construction, human percentile methods, expert review, and the limits of human references.
Counterfactual analysis in simulation, including AV versus human or AV versus alternate-policy comparisons under matched scene conditions.
Experience building or using a safety case, writing or reviewing safety claims, and determining what validation evidence is needed to support those claims.
Strong familiarity with hazard analysis and structured safety methods such as STPA, FMEA, fault trees, scenario-based hazard analysis, or equivalent approaches.
Experience with risk quantification, risk acceptance, severity and exposure reasoning, risk budgets, and mitigation decisions.
Experience turning legal or regulatory expectations into a defensible compliance strategy with requirements, metrics, test coverage, and documented claims.
Experience designing validation lifecycles that connect scope definition, requirements, hazard analysis, coverage planning, test generation, scorecards, release decisions, and continuous monitoring.
Experience building or guiding validation scorecards, confidence rubrics, behavior protocols, or similar products used by multiple engineering teams.
Experience reducing manual expert review through well-designed automation while preserving expert judgment where it matters.
A track record of developing other engineers, leading technical communities, and making a broader organization better at systems engineering and validation.

Responsibilities

Set the systems engineering approach for behavior validation from product requirements through release and monitoring, including behavior decomposition, metrics, acceptance criteria, coverage, confidence, and traceability.
Lead validation strategy for major capabilities and cross-cutting behaviors by connecting safety claims, legal and compliance expectations, hazard analysis, requirements, simulation tests, and release evidence.
Set the direction for behavior evaluation and simulation at scale across synthetic tests, road data, and counterfactual references, including scenario sourcing, sampling, orchestration, data quality, and reproducibility.
Lead cross-functional technical reviews and guide validation tools, data pipelines, simulation workflows, and analysis products toward repeatable systems; turning complex results into clear recommendations.