The Head of Consultant Relations will be responsible for executing Lantern's consultant relations strategy through named ownership of our major consulting and brokerage house relationships. This team both educates on the Lantern value proposition and differentiators for our surgery, cancer, and infusion care products, while simultaneously gathering insight and feedback to help Lantern continuously refine our messaging and support for our consultant partners. The team also partners closely with leaders from Sales and Client Success on relevant consultant-led client growth and expansion opportunities. Consultant Relations creates value primarily by being embedded in live deals and by building deep, durable relationships at both the national and local level — not by generating outreach volume on its own. The Head of the Consultant Relations team will continue to build out the account ownership model, metrics, supporting processes, and roles and responsibilities for the function based on business needs, and will be accountable for the success of the function. They are responsible for ensuring we build and execute on named account plans and coverage across the major houses, that escalations are routed appropriately so the team's capacity is focused on proactive relationship management, and that we have a regular cadence to report out on results against the plan to the Commercial Leadership Team. We recently completed a structured interview series across CR staff, sales leadership, and senior executives on the state of the function. The de-identified findings below are the starting point for this role, not a fixed set of answers — we want this leader's own point of view on how to act on them. Diffuse ownership is a live failure mode. Several interviewees independently described a “nobody owns [major house]” problem — large, high-influence consulting and brokerage houses with no single accountable relationship owner inside Lantern. Named-house ownership, with a cap of roughly 1–2 houses per person, is the model we're building toward. Escalation drag crowds out proactive work. CR's time has been disproportionately consumed by reactive escalation handling. Routing escalations outside CR is a near-term priority so the team's capacity goes toward proactive house management. Relationships build through deal involvement, not cold outreach. Trust with consultants compounds through being embedded in live deals — not through relationship-management touchpoints disconnected from the pipeline. Activity-based KPIs are broadly rejected. Top-of-funnel and activity metrics (meetings held, touches logged) were almost universally dismissed as the wrong way to measure CR, in favor of outcome- and relationship-health-based measurement. Coverage gaps are live, not hypothetical. Texas/Southeast and public sector/labor are both currently underserved segments and an active priority for this role to address. Team-based compensation has been the load-bearing mechanism preventing turf conflict between CR and core sales in the current hybrid model — an important constraint to preserve or deliberately redesign. CR-touched deals skew larger but win at a lower rate. We don't yet know whether that reflects a routing artifact (CR gets pulled into harder, larger, more contested deals) or an execution issue — an open analytical question this leader will be expected to help answer.
Stand Out From the Crowd
Upload your resume and get instant feedback on how well it matches this job.
Job Type
Full-time
Career Level
Senior